07
Mar

http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/global_warming_worldbook.html
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us

, , ,

13 Responses to “Who do you trust more Nasa Scientist or Republican Email Hackers?”

  • Healthy Environment

    Nasa Scientist

    edit: oh yeah, thumbs down for trusting a NASA Scientist!
    Oh shut up.

  • Western European Mutt - WEM

    The hackers were Russian BTW and I’ll trust any scientist who doesn’t work to fulfill a desired outcome.

    Face it dem, the books were cooked and the whole house of cards is crashing down as we speak.

  • John

    They probably weren’t Republican. They were probably from the U.K.

  • Aegis of Freedom

    Nasa scientists. The ones that prove the Earth’s atmosphere is 0.037% CO2, Mars’ atmoshpere is 95% CO2 and both follow the exact same cooling and warming cycle as the sun.

  • The Hearse Driver

    The hackers are not even Americans. I know of very few Russian Republicans.

  • Borat

    Nasa Scientist. See the reaction from the first post. A typical Republican fool, without an intelligent, or respectful answer

  • IndianaJohn

    NASA by far

  • coyotecoup

    Nasa scientists

    The email hacker thing is a hoax itself. It was created just before the Copenhagen summit in order to derail it. The Republican sheep will believe anything.

  • Jim

    NASA as there data was gathered during the past how ever many years, and criminals can’t be trusted.

  • andy

    I would trust no government organization when it comes to climate change. Even NASA from what I understand has not released it’s raw data so that other scientists can recreate their findings. In Science, if it is not repeatable then it is not correct. If you don’t give others your information so that they can independently verify it then it is not good data.

  • pinky

    big oil corporate pigs are f’ckn us

  • Sound_of_the_silenced

    NASA is the biggest pack on liars on the planet. You mean to tell me in all the vastness of the universe they haven’t found ANY signs of life else where. YEAH RIGHT!

    NASA= NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER

  • kathy_is_a_nurse

    The CRU emails were in the UK, darlin’. No Republicans were involved… sorry to burst your bubble. In fact, it is widely believed that the “hacker” was actually a CRU “whistleblower” who had been trying to draw attention to the various ILLEGAL and UNETHICAL activities going on in the organization. And that when, his internal efforts to go through channels proved to be fruitless, he released them to the Internet.

    As to NASA… I believe it was just last summer that NASA’s global temperature change data was shown to be faulty. NASA EVENTUALLY caught it, but they tried to be very hush-hush about the mistakes. So they are most definitely NOT infallible.

    So to answer your question, I choose the axiom put forth by Ronald Reagan many years ago… “Trust… but verify.” And the global warming community has definitely lost a LOT of credibility. They have to prove to ME that their activities are ethical and aboveboard. And the ONLY way to do that is revisit their theories and models… most especially ones that were influenced by the perpetrators of the CRU scandal.

Add reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree Plugin